Choose your club

Vital Mobile

Vital Shop

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

How serious are Chelsea about David Villa?

Over the weekend there were widespread rumours that Chelsea were reviving an interest in Valencia`s David Villa, with a view to signing the Spanish hitman over the Christmas transfer window.

That`s a transfer window that will resolutely open for Chelsea, now that the Court of Arbitration of Sport has suspended the sentence of FIFA`s Dispute Resolution Chamber, pending an appeal. Chelsea will therefore be able to buy and sell players in January. And with many of Chelsea`s offensive players away at the African Cup of Nations (Didier Drogba and Salomon Kalou), Chelsea are, apparently, thinking of bringing in long-stranding target David Villa.

Chelsea therefore sent a scout to watch Villa play for Spain over the weekend. The match was a friendly against Argentina, which was striking for the 'physical` nature of the Argentine game, which consisted of kicking the Spanish players. Chelsea`s scout in Spain is ex-Valencia player Juan Cruz Sol. The problem for Chelsea is that he was joined by Manchester United`s scout in Spain, Fernando Gómez, leading to speculation that Chelsea and ManYoo would be competing for the Valencia striker`s signature. Neither scout said anything, although it is thought that they were looking not only at David Villa but also winger David Silva.

The Daily Star today suggests that Chelsea are preparing a bid for David Villa as well as Madrid pony-tailed defender Sergio Ramos for some £50 million / €50 million for Villa / £25 million just for Villa (delete according to the source).

Chelsea`s interest in Villa is long-standing. Valencia have resisted that for two summers now, last summer Chelsea going head to head with Real Madrid and Barcelona. To the surprise of many, Villa ended the summer staying at Valencia, with a key factor being Villa`s oft-stated preference to stay in Spain.

Nevertheless, it is thought that a key factor that could push Villa out is that Valencia`s finances are in a disastrous state, having announced a debt of €550 million, and works on the planned new stadium at a critical phase. The club`s new President, Manuel Llorente, recently presented a budget that foresees €44 million in revenue from sales either of grounds or players. This was widely interpreted as being a green light to offload some of the club`s more profitable players.

David Villa is a sensible player who will weigh up any transfer in terms of sporting objectives. Neither Real Madrid nor Barcelona (both of whom made important changes to their frontlines over the summer) will be interested, which means that he might have to consider what he previously rejected: a move overseas.

Llorente is, however, clear that he will not sanction any sale over the winter: after a poor season 2008-2009, Valencia consider it essential to return to the Champions League, and both Villa and Silva are key players in that endeavour. Nevertheless, he has also announced that there will be belt-tightening: the club will, he says, not be able to sign €20 million players over the next few years, and that €550 million debt came after losing €70 million last season.

He also admitted that Villa and Silva were the subject of considerable attention. "Our footballers interest Real Madrid, Barcelona, Chelsea and Manchester United, but we think that to qualify for the next Champions League we need players to stay".

With such crippling debts, that principled stance could change, although Chelsea would need to put more on the table than the £25 million rumoured in the News of the World, which also suggests that David Villa is now Carlo Ancelotti`s 'number 1 target`. Other sources point out that Villa recently sacked his agent, apparently because that agent failed to engineer a big-money move over the summer.

Lest there be any doubt, Villa is a model professional on and off the pitch. He`s also a cold-blooded striker who has scored 10 goals in 13 games for Valencia, and he is likely to be part of Spain`s front two with Fernando Torres in South Africa next summer. Should a transfer happen, Chelsea would insist that it takes place over the winter, to provide for cover whilst Didier Drogba and Salomon Kalou are at the African Cup of Nations. Moreover, Chelsea`s transfer ban has only been suspended pending an appeal, so the club will need to buy now, bearing in mind that that ban could well kick back in later.

Should there be a head to head with Manchester United, Chelsea could well come out second best, particularly since Chelsea are in a hurry and Manchester United aren`t. Neither are Valencia.

That said, there are few better strikers in Europe today. David Villa would make a magnificent signing.



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer: Cendrowski  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday November 17 2009

Time: 12:00PM

Your Comments

If we're going to splash crazy money, why do it on Villa? He's repeatedly said he doesn't want Chelsea or even England; he's also reaching the peak of his career right now. What I'm saying has been repeated by a number of people here, and I agree: if we're spending a huge amount on one player, get someone young and with the potential to exceed Villa's abilities. Two come to mind: Aguero and Pato. That's it.
RadioactiveD
Haven't we been hearing the 'Valencia have to sell because they have crippling debts' argument for the past few years? And still nothing has materialised in that time. Quality striker he may be, but should we really be considering splashing out some £35m on a 27-year-old?
daspecial1
I forgot to add that while my opinion is shared by others, it has no relevance in the real world. What matters is what you're asking in the article: How serious are Chelsea? If tabloids are to be believed, very much so. We've built a squad of experienced players, those at the very top. Villa would make sense in that regard. Of course the downside is that all players decline and so will he, and possibly soon.
RadioactiveD
Can't we just buy back JFH from Woking? lol. I dunno about who to buy. Pato isn't likely to want to come whilst he's still in the CL. he's be cup-tied and he'd hate to watch AC make it through quite far. He's enjoying playing against RM and other big teams. Aguero will see another season out of the CL limelight as a bad thing, but maybe not bad enough to need a transfer. If he looks into the future and sees that there's no CL action next year if things stay as they are then perhaps he'll make the move for a transfer - i just hope his wages come down a bit. Seriously, i'm a year older than him and i do well on small percentage of his WEEKLY wage for my whole year! lol
LifeLongBlue
How old was Drogba when we signed him, was he a bad buy?
SpanishBlue
Drogba was 26 when we bought him in the summer of 2004, for some £24m. Now we're thinking about splashing out £35m on a 27-year-old? All I'm saying is it's a bit of a gamble, don't you think? Perhaps I'm still worrying over another Sheva Mk 2.
daspecial1
the one reason most people wouldn't want villa is because we all remember sheva.any big name striker linked with us will have that on them.
Tat
RadioactiveD, you are wrong that Villa has 'rejected' Chelsea or England. He has only said that he'd prefer to stay in Spain. Actually he has said also that he was flattered by Chelsea's interest.
EuroBlue
For that money, I would rather place my bet on Agüero. Much younger, and not less talented. Villa's lack of motivation to play abroad can only result in a declining form, which, eventually, will lead him to becoming a flop.
chelsey
Having said this, I would like to add that I personally do not believe those reports anyway. They got to fill the pages somehow, and Chelsea seems to be a good source to do just that. I do not think that there is even a single person within our club who would consider spending silly amounts of cash on a 27-year-old. To be honest, I am starting to get annoyed of all those reports. We were not the ones who spend 90m on this bloke from Manchester, and we were also not the ones who gave a certain Eto'o + 45m away to get Ibrahimovic; presenting us as a club that spends silly money left and right is not appropriate anymore.
chelsey
I would prefer Aguero for his age.
Seabourch
Although I agree with the majority here, I came to echo SpanishBlue's question. Chelsea payed a few quid for a 27 year old Drogba and he didn't turn out too badly.
outoftheblue
Villa brings nothing new to the party, apart from advancing years and a penchant for warmer climes! Leave him be. Aguero trumps him every time and in most departments.
mutters
Ah you gotta love all the speculation. so many "writers" nearly ended up loosing their jobs over our transfer ban... Unless it is a move to generate more shirt sales, I'd not expect blockbuster deal, especially with so many other strikers out there for less.
emigre
Drogba was barely 26 when he came, and he gave us something we definitely did not have....indeed few others anywhere had!
mutters
But surely with a younger Aguero available and able to give us more of his years than Villa, he is better. And he is more versatile, Aguero is an attacking midfielder and winger whereas Villa is just a second striker.
Seabourch
aguero!aguero!aguero!aguero!aguero!aguero!aguero! forget villa just get bloody aguero! aguero can upfront on his own, play a deeper role, play tip of diamond, play left and right foward while villa can only play alongside someone upfront. aguero makes so many goals as well as score them while villa just scores! chelsea sort it out!
MrDax
villa...no way,hes overated, its aguero or dont bother!!!
springy
Same opinion as most of you here, if at all we are breaking the bank,do it on Aguero.Atleast he's only 21!!
blueKnightz09
Drogba wasn't worth 24mil when we bought him, if it was any other club they wouldn't have had to pay anywhere near that. It's also silly to compare a 26 year old Drogba to a 27 year old Villa, Villa is at the peak of his career, and Drogba had just started his. He had only 2 years of top-flight experience when he joined us.
Saf 91
In any case, I think Villa would struggle in the PL. Both he and Aguero are small players, but Aguero is a lot stronger. Like Wayne Rooney, but with talent.
Saf 91
I can certainly see the argument for splashing the cash on the yopunger option but isn't Villa less of a gamble. I don't know the stats but i'm guessing his goal scoring record is better than Aguero and he has done it for longer. Aguero has talent and promise but we know that Villa is the real deal. There are no guarantees but in that sense, isn't Villa the 'safe' option? The age doesn't worry me too much. Maybe if he were 30 but at 27 there's no reason why he can't have 4, 5, even 6+ years left in him at the top level. Personally, as I keep saying, I'm not sure I want either, let alone which of the 2 I'd pick but I have seen much more of Villa and see no reason why he would struggle in the Prem. He is a fine goal scorer, no question of that.
SpanishBlue
OK, just checked the career scoring stats and both are impressive, though Villa's are better. Naturally given his age, Aguero has the potential to be better, or he may never reach Villa's heights. You pays your money Roman, you make your choice! I'm pretty certain that neither will be the player a certain little 30 year old Italian who cost £4.5m turned out to be! Not that that means anything, just that you don't always have to buy young or spend big!
SpanishBlue
spend wisely seems to be the motto!
merlin
I thiink that's the gist of what I was trying to say in two, very long posts, yes Merlin!
SpanishBlue
Villa is definitely the better goalscorer, but Aguero's game is about so much more than just scoring.
Saf 91
VILLA - No. AGUERO - Yes
djdutts
Euroblue: even if I am wrong about Villa rejecting Chelsea, it's been reported many times that he did. Could be lies, I don't know. Either way, I'd rather us sign someone young and with promise than a player not too far away from a career decline. All this is being said as if we really need a new striker. Maybe we do. But what happens when we sign someone? Villa will rightly expect to start--so we bench Anelka? Umm, that's ridiculous.
RadioactiveD
I think one point that has been overlooked is Spanish blue reminding us of one Gianfranco Zola. There were two reasons he succeeded at Chelsea. A) He was clearly talented. There were only twenty odd players worthy of being mentioned in the same breath as him playing at the time. B) He had the correct ATTITUDE. That is why Villa is so appealing, he was a late bloomer and had to earn his stripes, which means he will work hard anywhere he goes. The reason he seems more acceptable that Aguero is because Aguero has just always been the pampered young hotshot, and has never really had any massive hurdles to overcome (aside from moving from Argentina to Spain). If he was a couple of years younger I would be raving for us to buy Iaquinta!
bluethrough
Just Aguero or Villa is not the solution. With present style of play, they would struggle, because in the midfield we don't have players who can play those passes in the final third of the pitch. If we are going to get new strikers in the Aguero or Villa mould, we need some technically good passing players in the midfield.
vetri
I've always been for Pato, but Villa would do nicely for me actually. Since when is 27 old? I've heard several times that Villa doesnt wanna leave Spain tho...so its more likely Real or Barca for him. And the younger the player is the less I'm concerned about them being CL tied. If he's younger, get him NOW for the long term and play him in Cup ties and the Prem till next season.
blues first
...and I agree with bluethru a bit. I worry about Aguero's attitude.
blues first
and i dont think villa would slot straight in but aguero can...i really want t o see kalou leave
haji ahmed
Aguero Aguero Aguero!
JT_daniel
Pure speculations! If we are to spend 20-35 M on a striker we must go for Aguero.. he has the future ahead of him... Villa is a bit too old. Great player tough. I don't think we get any of them. If Man U get Aguero or Villa then I'm worried!
Rune3k
Exactly bluethrough! vetri - aren't Ballack, Joey Cole, Deco and Frank Lampard some of the finest passers in the game? I think that Villa or Aguero would love to have them behind them.
SpanishBlue
SB makes a good point that I tried to bring up somewhere else - if we're planning to stockpile these type of players in January, with a view to getting ourselves through possibly two transfer windows in which we can't participate, what are the impliations going to be? Will Villa be happy to come in and sit on the bench? Will Anelka be happy to be dropped/rotated? He certainly doesn't deserve that, in my mind. Isn't there also the small matter of Borini/Sturridge/Di Santo to consider?
daspecial1
I don't see any point in Villa. It's him or Aguero, not both. The player of interest at Valencia is David Silva. He has a better character than Villa, who I've seen when he's in indifferent form - Quaresma had more character (and he had none except when it suited him). The person who first stated Villa wouldn't survive outside of Spain was Ten Cate and I'd put more faith in his view. Villa is a no.
Squiddy
Lets FIFA10

Have Your Say

Click here to register an account

Recent Articles

Chelsea - No, Thank You JT (Tuesday February 9 2010)

Are they Becoming Extinct? (Tuesday February 9 2010)

Everton v Chelsea Preview! (Tuesday February 9 2010)

Chelsea - It`s Watford! (Tuesday February 9 2010)

Chelsea - Toffee Talk! (Tuesday February 9 2010)

Chelsea - The Anniversary! (Monday February 8 2010)

Chelsea - An Omen? (Monday February 8 2010)

Chelsea - Speaking of John Terry! (Monday February 8 2010)

Chelsea - Post Arsenal Notes (Monday February 8 2010)

VIDEO Highlights: Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal (Monday February 8 2010)

Chelsea - A Wicked Sense of Humour! (Sunday February 7 2010)

Chelsea - Wenger`s Famous Last Words! (Sunday February 7 2010)

Chelsea 2 Arsenal 0 (Sunday February 7 2010)

Match Day Moments - Arsenal (h) (Sunday February 7 2010)

Fleet Street 1 - England 0 (Sunday February 7 2010)

Vital Chelsea - Compo Time - Arsenal (h) (Saturday February 6 2010)

Chelsea - Carlo Backs JT! (Saturday February 6 2010)

Chelsea v Arsenal Preview! (Saturday February 6 2010)

England's Football Reality TV Show (Friday February 5 2010)

Chelsea - Carvalho`s Battle Cry! (Friday February 5 2010)

VIDEO Preview: Chelsea v Arsenal (Friday February 5 2010)

OLASAL's State of the Nation 3 (Friday February 5 2010)

Chelsea Cleared Over Kakuta! (Thursday February 4 2010)

Chelsea - Zhirkov Offski? (Thursday February 4 2010)

Chelsea - Mikel To Return? (Thursday February 4 2010)

Chelsea - Lets make a Mess(i) of Kakuta (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Chelsea - The 4th Place Conundrum? (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Chelsea - Ancelotti on Tuesday Night! (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Chelsea - Set Piece Mania? (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Stats: Hull City v Chelsea 02/02/10 19:45 (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Phew, I'm Glad That's Over! (Wednesday February 3 2010)

OLASAL's State of the Nation 2 (Wednesday February 3 2010)

Hull 1 Chelsea 1 (Tuesday February 2 2010)

Chelsea - Match Day Moments Hull (a) (Tuesday February 2 2010)

Chelsea - Begovic Snub? (Tuesday February 2 2010)

TERRY TO REMAIN ENGLAND CAPTAIN (Tuesday February 2 2010)

English Tabloids! (Monday February 1 2010)

Chelsea - It`s gone Too Far. (Monday February 1 2010)

Chelsea Preview - Hull (a) (Monday February 1 2010)

JT. England captain. Or not? (Monday February 1 2010)

OLASAL's State of the Nation... (Monday February 1 2010)

Chelsea - How Did Your JT Poll Go? (Sunday January 31 2010)

Burnley 1 Chelsea 2 (Saturday January 30 2010)

Chelsea - A Bridge Too Far? (Saturday January 30 2010)

Chelsea - MOTM Forum Update! (Saturday January 30 2010)

WELL DONE YOU MUPPETS (Saturday January 30 2010)

Vital Chelsea Compo - Burnley (a) (Friday January 29 2010)

Chelsea - Early Team News! (Friday January 29 2010)

Ferdinand to Fight Ban (Friday January 29 2010)

Chelsea - Youngster Back Out on Loan! (Friday January 29 2010)

Ashley Cole Hit With Driving Ban (Friday January 29 2010)

Burnley v Chelsea Preview! (Friday January 29 2010)

VIDEO Preview: Burnley - Chelsea (Friday January 29 2010)

Missile Throwing? (Thursday January 28 2010)

Vital Chelsea - Compo Winner! (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - McLeish Praise for Chelsea! (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - Lampard Best in World! (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - Ancelotti on Being Top! (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - The Johnson Situation? (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - Mutu Fails Another Drug Test (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea - Youth team prepare for Cup (Thursday January 28 2010)

Gudjohnsen seals London Move (Thursday January 28 2010)

VIDEO Highlights: Chelsea 3-0 Birmingham (Thursday January 28 2010)

Chelsea 3 Birmingham 0 (Wednesday January 27 2010)

Chelsea - Mancienne Dismisses Wolves Move! (Wednesday January 27 2010)

Match Day Moments - Birmingham (h) (Wednesday January 27 2010)

Chelsea - Don't Do It Eidur! (Wednesday January 27 2010)

'THIS IS SPARTA!' (Wednesday January 27 2010)

From SW6 To Birmingham (Wednesday January 27 2010)

Chelsea - One In and One Out! (Tuesday January 26 2010)

Chelsea - PNE MOTM Results! (Tuesday January 26 2010)

Chelsea - Latest Anelka Update! (Tuesday January 26 2010)

Chelsea v Birmingham Preview! (Tuesday January 26 2010)

Get Adobe Flash player
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. merlin 171
2. mutters 109
3. JT_daniel 92
4. LamparDrogbAnelKalou 80
5. Seabourch 75
6. Tambling 53
7. RadioactiveD 48
8. kishaloy_nag_blue 47
9. Squig 47
10. BlindJak 46

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Chelsea 2 - 0 Arsenal
Hull City 1 - 1 Chelsea
Burnley 1 - 2 Chelsea
Chelsea 3 - 0 Birmingham
Chelsea 7 - 2 Sunderland
Chelsea 2 - 1 Fulham

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 25 18 4 3 +40 58
2. Man Utd 25 18 2 5 +41 56
3. Arsenal 25 15 4 6 +30 49
4. Liverpool 25 13 5 7 +17 44
5. Spurs 25 12 7 6 +20 43
6. Man City 23 11 8 4 +13 41
7. Aston Villa 24 11 8 5 +13 41

Breaking League News

And our defence tomorrow is....
» Spurs : 09/02/2010 19:05:00
Chelsea - No, Thank You JT
» Chelsea : 09/02/2010 17:50:00
West Ham - Zola Hits Out At Money Talk!
» West Ham : 09/02/2010 17:47:00
Ferdinand - Bowing to Pressure (Already)?
» Chelsea : 09/02/2010 17:37:00
Chelsea - It Could Have Been So Different!
» Chelsea : 09/02/2010 17:25:00
Are they Becoming Extinct?
» Chelsea : 09/02/2010 17:11:00
Everton v Chelsea Preview!
» Chelsea : 09/02/2010 17:02:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Everton v Chelsea?
Suggested By: merlin
Everton Win! 14%
Chelsea Win! 60%
Score Draw! 26%
0-0 Draw! 0%
as seen on newsnow.co.uk