Writer: Merlin 
Date:Wednesday December 19 2012
Time: 4:39PM
The increasing gossip, relating to the future of Daniel Sturridge, infers that his time at Chelsea Football Club is definitely coming to an end.
The inference being that although we`re seriously lacking in the strikers department, Sturridge will be off in the January transfer window.
The latest reports infer that both Liverpool and Tottenham are willing to stump up the reported fee of £12 million but these same reports go on to infer that Sturridge has already decreed that Anfield will be his destination and it is there that he will get his wish to play as a central striker.
Here at Vital Chelsea, we`d be very surprised if Daniel was to feature much in a Benitez starting eleven between now and the window opening, just in case an injury would stall a move that, we believe, is designed to raise funds to be put into the pot for us to obtain a world class striker to assist Fernando Torres!
Looking Towards the Bundesliga (Friday May 24 2013)
The King is back where he belongs. (Friday May 24 2013)
Mourinho had an AVB (Thursday May 23 2013)
Arnesen and Hamburg Part Company (Thursday May 23 2013)
Two Game Ban Conundrum? (Thursday May 23 2013)
Turkish Striker Interest Registered! (Thursday May 23 2013)
Match Day Moments - Man City (USA) (Thursday May 23 2013)
Mourinho Arrives at Chelsea in £50 Million Deal (Thursday May 23 2013)
Chelsea - Rooney Is Leaving United! (Thursday May 23 2013)
The (Mourinho?) Central Midfield (Wednesday May 22 2013)
| 1. | syed230183_chelseafc | 622 |
| 2. | HGH Magic | 467 |
| 3. | Ken4CFC | 355 |
| 4. | @Mq | 275 |
| 5. | Desmondadonis | 246 |
| 6. | The Persian | 226 |
| 7. | 3nity | 206 |
| 8. | Humza_96 | 171 |
| 9. | ChampionBlue | 150 |
| 10. | Blu_run | 135 |
| Latest Results | ||||
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 1 | Everton |
| Aston Villa | 1 | - | 2 | Chelsea |
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 2 | Spurs |
| Man Utd | 0 | - | 1 | Chelsea |
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 0 | Swansea |
| Liverpool | 2 | - | 2 | Chelsea |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 1. Man Utd | 38 | 28 | 5 | 5 | +43 | 89 |
| 2. Man City | 38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | +32 | 78 |
| 3. Chelsea | 38 | 22 | 9 | 7 | +36 | 75 |
| 4. Arsenal | 38 | 21 | 10 | 7 | +35 | 73 |
| 5. Spurs | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | +20 | 72 |
| 6. Everton | 38 | 16 | 15 | 7 | +15 | 63 |
| 7. Liverpool | 38 | 16 | 13 | 9 | +28 | 61 |
| Eric Lichaj To Be Released?
» Aston Villa : 24/05/2013 12:22:00
|
| Lambert Answers Benteke. Another Undeserved Saga?
» Aston Villa : 24/05/2013 12:13:00
|
| NEW POLL: Should Nzonzi be allowed to leave?
» Stoke : 24/05/2013 12:11:00
|
| Begovic exit story quashed by chief executive
» Stoke : 24/05/2013 12:03:00
|
| Redknapp receives backing for Everton role
» Everton : 24/05/2013 11:57:00
|
| Departing Delap saddened but vows to carry on
» Stoke : 24/05/2013 11:48:00
|
| New Stoke away kit a miss with fans
» Stoke : 24/05/2013 11:44:00
|
The whole breaking into the first team is a myth at Chelsea because nowadays unless you are bought for a huge some of money (in which case your place in the starting line up is a given) there is no chance of you making it at Chelsea. I fear for players like McEachran, Piazon and Chalobah.
And I'LL REPEAT it wasn't him who tried to "force a move"..it was Liverpool who came in for him because they were short on strikers and thought that they may be able to exploit the situation with Danny. Why would he try "forcing" a move to Liverpool when he could play for a higher club; why not force a move to Arsenal or Tottenham, surely that's more logical from his stand point? I'll tell you why, because he wasn't doing any "forcing", it was the other way round...LIVERPOOL CAME IN FOR HIM!!!!
"A single player being treated unfairly"...there is no point trying to explain to you for a 4th time, clearly you're not understanding. That's obvious when you go on to relate this point to loosing on purpose because of the coach we have. The 2 issues are completely different. The fact that you still think the issue is about a "single player" bemuses me. And please don't question my attitude and tell me what a "true fans" attitude should be; who are you to define that? Unlike you I'm looking at the bigger picture, considering the longevity and wellbeing of the club. The issue is bigger then what you think.
Another thing, please don't patronise me...I'm a postgrad at Cambridge, I don't need an approval of my intelligence from you. I'm a grown man, I don't need you forcing your idea of what you think my conduct should be. There is nothing wrong with my conduct or my language. I use the word B.S (note not spelling it out) once on a forum; an informal environment which means its not necessarily inappropriate (people say and spell out a lot worse). If I'm not wrong it was you who chose to engage in a discussion. If you didn't like the tone then don't reply, there's no love lost. The fact that you expect your tone of writing on a football forum from others is laughable. If we all had our way then you would be more concise so I don't have to read essay's length of text where only 2 points are actually really covered.