UK time is: 07:46:54
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

The Game Changer

Enter January 2007, United are narrowly leading back-to-back Premier League winners Chelsea with a strike force of Rooney, Saha and Solskjaer.

With 4 trophies to compete for, United turn to Barcelona's then 35 year old striker Henrik Larrson who puts in 10 good shifts for United scoring 4 goals, with 2 of them being match winners.

Brought in on loan, he helps United win the title by 6 points over Chelsea. Before him, 31 year old Teddy Sheringham lit up Old Trafford for a 4 year spell which included 3 titles and a crucial goal in the Champions League final.

This summer, United again were the team who decided to go against their youthful policy to recruit RVP from Arsenal, and it's probably why they are first and we are third right now.

Goal after goal from a natural scorer who's thriving from the service. Age for once, was not a factor in the signing. United have shown over the years, that a team can reap rewards by bucking the trend in the philosophy and taking a risk for the right player.

Perhaps one can learn from that. Chelsea are in need of a game changer right now, someone who can come in and score a flurry of goals to stop the reliance on Torres and take us over the final stretch especially given the hectic schedule coming up.

Enter David Villa. A player who needs little introduction and is famed for his goal scoring prowess at both national and International level. His finishing remains one of the most clinical in the game, whilst the curve shot around the keeper into the net remains his trademark.

He's well capable of beating several players on his own and loves cutting in from the wide spaces. He still hasn't lost his scoring boots as he averages a goal every 80 minutes for Barca this season. He's had limited playtime however having returned this season from a broken leg.

The cumulative effect of the above means a reported price tag of 12million and a wage of around 130k. Which begs an interesting question. Chelsea have some very talented young forwards coming through who should be able to challenge in a year or so time (Lukaku anyone), so we don't really need a long term forward.

At the same time, Villa fits into the team like a fiddle. Chelsea will soon have only one recognized striker in Torres who happens to be great friends with David Villa and has competed for the Spanish striker role with him to great effect in the past.

Also, his style of play is suited to Chelsea's quick paced, on the ground play and his technical ability makes him ideal to take up the positions vacated by our creative players and still be devastating, something Torres fails to do when he's forced wide or deeper. He's as clinical as they get, so if he gets the odd chance in a game, we can expect him to take it, even late on when the pressure is immense to get a winner, due to his experience.

He could be the difference between a point, or three, on several occasions. The downside to the deal is the recovery from Injury, but if Torres could be made fit again, I don't see why the Chelsea medical staff should have any problems with Villa.

Above that, unlike Torres, Villa's game is all about his technical ability rather than his physique. This technical ability still seems as good as ever judging by his limited showings at Barca this term. All that in mind, I'm hoping for a deal to go through and I'd have Villa before I'd have any of Negredo, Ba, Bony, Schurrle, Llorente or even Cavani (given the prices involved). Falcao ruled himself out of the equation anyway. He could be the difference between a top 4 finish and a sustained title challenge.

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: maka4chelsea Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday December 28 2012

Time: 6:14PM

Your Comments

Eidur Gudjohnson. Simple as that.
Good article sir. You make your case persuasively but i disagree. Have you seen Villa play since he came back from injury? I have several times and honestly sometimes i have to look carefully because he is sometimes not even recognizable as the same player who was such a terror with Valencia. Remember that this was an injury so severe it actually threatened his very career. If you have seen Villa play for Barca and even the little showing he had for La Roja since he came back from injury you would know that he is presently a shadow of the once great El Guaje. One can look at this one of two ways; either he will improve and get back to where he was or he will never be the same again. This script is very familiar..this is was the same story with Torres when we got him from Liverpool after a spate of injuries and clearly dropped form and here we are today. It is instructive that Villa cannot get a solid starting spot in Barca despite the fact there are no other forwards other than Messi who are in that great form for them..Tello, Sanchez and Pedro are all just decent..none of them is lighting it up..yet he cant get regular spots and his productivity has plummetted very badly..Class they say is permanent but on c form currently David Villa at 12-15mill transfer fee with a multi year contract and no resale value as well as a wkly stipend that will start at over 100k is a very dangerous gamble. Of course Rafa wants more spaniards in the makes life easier for him as he tries to stay in this job as long as possible but i dont think this is a wise idea unless we get at least one other solid more injury of note (and that is not a stretch in the rough and tumble BPL) and Villa may next be facing retirement. I am simply not sold on this.
Hmmm!talkin sense,a very incisive article,i think am buyin the idea of gettin david villa now
But only on loan till we get our targets in the summer
i think we should get d.villa,ba,benat,willian and fellaini in january.the league is ours.
If I had to take strikers in January I would take a remy/bony/gomis/schurrle/pato to buy and then David villa on loan! At least then we have two full time strikers and a loanee third striker who as you said can still be a game changer. I still think villa has something to offer and as you say in our current set up i believe he would fit right in. If its true and arsenal are going to activate demba ba's contract then why don't we? I'm pretty sure falcao will not move in January so we can forget him. I see pato is available for around 12mil!!! Why not get him? He still young and a very good player. Yes injury prone but if we got villa on loan we would have 3 strikers to play with.
bring him for 6 month LOAN.....we should not buy him...if you can get him for loan that its ok....or else go and buy damio schrulle other option...
Nice article mate, but I agree with Gabeu on this one, villa as I said in another article is washed up, right now I'll liken david villa to a sweet oranje that have been squeezed dry of its juices, that is how he is right now, to cough up 12 million for him will be very bad business, I prefer we get negredo for that amount or go for another young striker
Can we not get him on loan instead? He says he wants to retire in spain. A good loan deal could be good as we seem to have an average relationship with Barca?
get him on loan and buy daimao for 20-25million, and either mountinho or benant and we will be fine
get bonyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Bony is afcon bound,considerin our present strikin dept predicament do we really have the time to wait for him?
sup guys i can't log in using my phone but i can see all the comments! anyone knows what i can do? my phone is C3300K samsung
There's no way you'd comment without loggin in @bluesinme
@leye...He probably used another phone to log in and comment
This was the article u were talking about Maka,lil wonder you were excited. Lol...pretty incisive article,lovely stuff mate. As much as I wouldn't mind having Villa on loan it all might just be tabloid bull*****...according to @barcastuff: Barcelona want to offer Villa, contract until 2014, a renewal in the coming months. If he doesn't accept, he could leave in the summer [el9].
'll take villa on loan till the end of the season...if he gives 70% of who he used to be prior to injury then that will be really good. Although getting villa on loan should be in addition to signing a young striker full of potential (Bony, ba (not exactly young but can do a job), Jovetic e.t.c)..cant wait for the market to officially open...i hope we get it right.
Villa on loan at current wages of 130k a week is just approximately 2.6m (worst case scenario) till may assuming we are paying every single dime (which might not be the case), i think the risk is worth taking when one considers the reward we could potentially get if he ends up being decent...from the figures, a loan move does not look bad at view though.
is anyone considering the home grown rule before taking there names. At current save we will have 4 homegrown players less by next summer. Any ways i shall take negrado Over villa as he is young and shall have some resale value if things don't workout.
Blue India
Its a well written article,and i fancy Villa deal,but maybe on a loan basis.
Even if we get Ba, we should go for Villa Loan option. He adds depth to our attack. He is technical, clinical. He can assist others. Loan him till summer and let him go back to Barcelona to play regularly. If he comes on loan, he will hungry to show that he is capable of playing at high level. a win-win for all 3 parties involved (Barca, Chelsea & Villa)
Torres was talked about mre than you have on Villa and after that injury, he is not the same player we were used to. I think Villa will not be the kind of player you are protracting now.
Maybe a loan deal till the end of the season with Villa wanting to come back from the slump and Chelsea needing silverware, both will be motivated

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Chelsea Articles

Stoke v Chelsea - Stat Attack (Sunday December 21 2014)

Mourinho Never Had Any Doubts! (Saturday December 20 2014)

Courtois - A Glove Affair (Saturday December 20 2014)

They Played for Both (Stoke) - Alan Hudson (Saturday December 20 2014)

Name the Starting XI - Stoke (a) (Saturday December 20 2014)

Stoke (a) - A Mixed Bag! (Friday December 19 2014)

Archived Chelsea Articles

List All Vital Chelsea Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. kolagold25 125
2. Bharath Narayanan 100
3. BlueMIA 70
4. BOTUM 55
5. Tambling 54
6. StamfordDLion 51
7. Seabourch 42
8. Michael Reid 39
9. DeepBlue1 39
10. merlin 36

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Chelsea 2 - 0 Hull City
Newcastle 2 - 1 Chelsea
Chelsea 3 - 0 Spurs
Sunderland 0 - 0 Chelsea
Chelsea 2 - 0 WBA
Liverpool 1 - 2 Chelsea

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 16 12 3 1 +23 39
2. Man City 17 12 3 2 +22 39
3. Man Utd 17 9 5 3 +12 32
4. West Ham 17 9 4 4 +10 31
5. Southampton 17 9 2 6 +15 29
6. Arsenal 17 7 6 4 +9 27
7. Spurs 17 8 3 6 -1 27

Breaking League News

Totally Deserved, says Gus Poyet
Sunderland : 22/12/2014 01:34:00
Pardew Will Have To Live With 4 In A Row Tab.
Sunderland : 22/12/2014 01:12:00
4 In A Row @NUFC
Newcastle : 22/12/2014 00:52:00
Sunderland Beat Newcastle Yet Again
Sunderland : 21/12/2014 22:31:00
Anfield Points Lost, Saved, Won And Dropped
Arsenal : 21/12/2014 21:25:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Stoke v Chelsea?
Suggested By:  merlin
Stoke to Win! 7%
Chelsea to Win! 89%
Score Draw! 4%
0-0! 0%