UK time is: 15:46:56
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Mes Que un Club;

For some this article may be pointless. For those folks be kind enough to just pass it by. For those who understand what troubles me..even if they agree or disagree your views, ideas and opinions on this subject matter are most welcome.

The title of the article; "Mes Que un Club" is the motto for FC Barcelona. For those of you who are Spanish challenged it means; "More than just a club". Those 4 words encompass the Barca philosophy and I have chosen them to make my points on this matter because our club owner Roman has made no pretensions of his admiration (some may say obsession) with all things Barca. It is well noised that he would like us to play like them, if he could he would like to get several of their players and he has been offering ungodly amounts of money in the attempt to lure their most successful coach to Chelsea.

The thing is ..there is far more to Barca than the tika-taka..there is far more to the club than all the recent trophies, there is far more to the club than even Messi..There is far more and I fear that superficial observers don`t realize this. What I say here also applies in varying degrees to other great institutions of club football in Europe (I am not versed enough in the history of the game in South America, Asia or Africa to speak of those regions). These same considerations apply to clubs like ManU, Bayern Munich, Inter Milan, Real, Juve and yes even Liverpool. Newer models of this ethos like Borussia Dortmund and Porto and until recently to even clubs like AC Milan, Arsenal and Benfica.

Beyond the present day Glitz of barca is a club that has a well defined philosophy of style of play and has patiently built it from the ground up. There is a history that has been handed on from one generation of players to the next with a constant basic set of values. There is a consistency of style and desired goals mixed with patience that has allowed them develop from within their ranks a number of players and coaches that have gone through some lean times as well as the now evident golden generation. But lest people like Roman forget this is more than a club..this a family..this club has retained in its squad an aging and sickly Eric Abidal, this is a club that is overseeing the current care of a sick Tito Villonova and had done the same previously for him without blinking an eye. This a club that dared to take a gamble on a young boy from Rosario Argentina and paid handsomely for his very expensive growth hormone treatments for years before he became the very best footballer of this generation..they cared enough to take the risk when he was essentially a nobody. This is a club that just granted a multiple year contract renewal to a club legend Carles Puyol who is not your typical new age sleek Barca defender. He is a fossil, a remnant of an age past..an old school no nonsense center back..but a Catalan through and though who started out with Barca when they were struggling in the shadow of mighty Real. This is a Barca that also just renewed the contracts of an aging Xavi who despite his obvious genius is clearly on the wrong side of 30, is no longer as spry as he used to be and has recently been having more time out on account of injury than ever before in his storied career.

So while there are clubs like Barca who are clearly 'more than just a club' then there are clubs like Anzhi Machachkala, the new age PSG, Man City and others who are clearly and unapologetically simply mercenary recruitment centers who are frankly speaking "Just a club". These guys make no bones about it..they are about success now and simply go out to try and buy it, they really could care less for their recruits as persons be they coaches or players or whoever else. Once any of these begin to decline or are not as glitzy as initially they simply kick them out and bring in the new flavor of the month.

I leave it to each of you to decide to which broad class of team you feel Chelsea belongs to..i thought I always knew without doubt since I started supporting this side in the early 90s but in the past few years I cannot but wonder and the doubts are growing. Yes we are getting results now which is great but my growing unease is what sort of team are we becoming? What sort of team are we ultimately aiming to be? I recollect the recent comments of Nico Anelka some time ago when he said " Chelsea use you when they need you and discard you when they don`t" It may have seemed harsh but may not be entirely unwarranted.

Some may actually say it is pointless how we run our business as long as we continue getting trophies and results. Some would say Lamps does not deserve to even be offered a new contract by us (no matter what type of contract not even a 1 yr recurrent with reduced pay or less), others say similarly that JT is also not deserving to even be offered any new contract no matter the terms. Others opine that the way we dealt with Danny Sturridge's situation was totally appropriate and fine as has been the way we have dealt with past coaches like Jose, Carlo, RDM and even AVB. This school of thought says these guys should be glad to get their severance pay from Roman..once we are done with you..take your money and move on and we will go out to get replacements and continue rolling. As long as we keep winning and get trophies who cares? This may all be about differences in philosophies. Should the club be run as a pure business, a family or an amalgam of both? Should the club be purely about dollars and cents and the bottom line or should we care that the club have a heart and soul?

Whatever you think, this merits some thought. One thing though; the mindset of a mercenary is always different from that of a soldier fighting for his home country..they can never be the same. There is a reason that Messi cannot be bought from Barca for virtually any prize and why the same probably applies to Phillip Lahm at Bayern..it is the reason Liverpool are not seeking to kick Carragher or Gerrard out the window and is the reason why Thierry Henry keeps coming back to the Emirates since he left them. There is a reason beyond the players why Barca always seem to have more passion than the current Real players..for one group they play for more than a club, the other group often seem to just be doing the job..clock in, clock out and get paid. This mind set of the mercenary when it creeps into a manager and his crew, when it creeps into players, it affects everything; the passion, and effort with which they do their jobs, the risks and concessions they are willing to take as well as their commitment to the cause. We need to remember this when we talk of players and coaches. A Rafa who sees himself as just a stop gap cannot but have a very different mindset than a Rafa if he had the respect of being a permanent appointed coach. Anyone who thinks that the English youngsters on our side have not taken note of how Danny`s situation was handled are kidding themselves. Beyond that we need to be very careful of what happens with our best players as they hit that 27-29yr old threshold..dont be surprised when some of these guys then up and leave to greener pastures at the first chance. We have been sowing certain seeds..a time will come when we will reap the harvest of what we are sowing now.

I will conclude this with a thought for Roman and his three Amigos to ponder. As long as this obsession for all things Barca continues for Roman it may be instructive for them to go back and study closely how that dynasty was built because we certainly seem to be going about it very differently..rather than "more than just a club" what seems more apt for Chelsea FC is that it is "No more than just a club"




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: GabeU Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday December 31 2012

Time: 4:13AM

Your Comments

What beats me is roman wanting to play like barca but our policies are opposite of wht barca are doing.for me football is a game played by a group of people and hence they must be made to feel as such.there must be a strong social ties in team to make a good family.these ties are enhanced through proper treatment of old and young players.thnks gabeu for your article.
blue5
I knew it was no other than u when I read the first paragraph, nicely written mate, well the dice is cast, we'll see the number we would come up with and I hope it would be favourable, I don't buy the idea of letting cole,lamps and terry go, as I said we'll suffer for it and it would be unpleasant, truth be told rafa's tactic in yesterday's game was *****, if not for the brilliance and timing of lampard, we would have lost that game, I agree that lamps isn't as consistent as he use to be, but I'll advocate that we retain him, we should also stop playing him in the pivot and let him play his normal role as a no.10 whenever we want to play him either as a sub for oscar/mata or in odd games when we need to rest players or play him as a supporting striker if we are ever going to play that 2 uppfront formation, we need our leaders until other leaders are forged, that's my 2 cents
Desmondadonis
Keep Lampard, A. Cole AND Never joke with my John Terry ooooo, get a player suitable for the double pivot role and move Lampard upfront, that is where He's more dangerous
Ikdaniels
excellent article. I have for long been advocating creating a footballing philosophy, which is the template that all activities should follow. This includes scouting, youth development, etc. Leadership can only develop if the players, management have an emotional bonding with the club. In our current scenario it will not be surprising to see players like hazard, oscar go to madrid go 5 years time. Believe it or not with rafa we now have a chance to build a dynasty. He is a proven manager go the mould of alex f, jose m. Etc. I have been a long time admirer of rafa and i believe if we can retain rafa for 3 to 4 years with ex players like zola, may be lamps deputising him as assistant managers or youth team managers we can build a strong dynasty which will last for decades.
Blue India
we can cry...and i am...all we want. but lamps is gone...and we are fecked...we have gone backwards ten years in our own development. i said it when rdm was fired...roman is truly clueless and has no regard for identity...when he is done with us we will be soulless and less than just a club...nice article by the way
Gian-Franco/Luca
Brilliant thinking..The club is at the delicate stage of its development that is different from where City, PSG or Anzhi are at the moment as these clubs are still way behind us in terms of development. For, these clubs, the FFP will have a far greater impact on their growth especially if its hinged on making expensive purchases. For chelsea, our decision making at this time is soo crucial..I really hope the decision makers have an understanding of these things...3 of the current players we have over thirtY (JT, Lamps & Cole) are still somewhat important to us both for on and off the field reasons..I expect the club to sit down with these and work out something that will not harm the club's financial records and also make the players happy..of course their is a chance the players could reject the offers on the table, but then that will be a different ball game. The key issue with my points is that from what I have observed about Roman's personality, he appears gentle but lacks emotion, he is ruthless, stubborn and obstinate..key ingredents needed to succeed in the modern day business environment..these are the characteristics are reflect in the way the club is run...what baffles me most is what will be the trigger event that will make the club see reason to change?..I hope such an event will not have a lasting impact on the future of the club...somtimes I really wish the decisiion makers take a sec to read some of these threads and articles on VC...i know the chance of such happening is near zero..We can only hope things change for the better very soon...starting from Jan 2013.
layorh12
This is the best article I av come across this year.....Gabeu did you keep this for the last day of the year?nice 1 mate,most people complain about chelsea's inability to comply with FFP regulations as one reason to get the old players of our age bill but no player in barca's first 11 earns less than a hundred thousand euros week in week out...Barcelona pays one of the highest salary in the world today and yet doesn't see that as an excuse to release their old stars.....we need the leadership of cole,lamps and jt even though they are past their best,they can be managed in such a way that the club will get the best out of them....Nice one again Gabeu!!!
Hazard11
Yawn. just WHEN DID ROMAN PROFESS his admiration (some may say obsession) with all things Barca? Your pretext has no substance.
Pantisocrates
Did Roman really say he wants us to play like Barca, or is the media as usually trying to divert attention for personal gain?? If Roman wanted Barca why would he refuse to grant Txixi his request of total control of the team affairs, and buidling from the ground??
@Mq
You guys have a tendency to over exaggerate stuff. Roman only wants us to play good football, not necessarily Barca-style, if he did I can assure you those Man$hitty execs from Barca would be at Chelsea, and they aren't, so plz desist from claiming stuff without concrete evidence *smh*
@Mq
As for the "old players" mention, there's absolutely NO REASON to pay a squad player more than 100K, especially when BETTER PLAYERS are earning almost half that. If Lamps/Cashley really want to stay, they'll take the pay cut and stay (Cashley would never) but I doubt Lamps wants a cut, especially as China and USA are offering better monies. In that case, legend or not, if he wants more than 100K then it's best he leaves, we have BETTER players like Mata and Oscar now, and with his salary we can get 2 more players of that mould and we'll be better without him.
@Mq
As for his "goals" yesterday, Sturridge was derided for being a "poacher" by pretty much the same ppl praising Lamps wjo did nothing all game but pick scraps from people's hard work, I can assure you if we had Falcao or some1 like, Lamps wouldn't have scored those goals but the striker (which we don't have right now) so to pay some1 100K+ just for goal poaching every now and then is ludicrous, especially if and when we get Demba Ba
@Mq
You guys amaze at times. av u done in detail feasibility analysis on barca. ffs dey have one of the biggest arenas in camp nou 3x bigger than de bridge, their deal with qatar foundation is one of de biggest, bigger global appeal. all ahead of chelsea. i remember de last time our dear roman wanted a bigger venue we embarrassed him but yet still he forks out over 80m on tranfers n wud be givn us a new year present soon. romans only negative is his firing of coaches even with RDM we all know he never liked him as a coach. and dat gamble failed. Pls give Roman a break n deal with de greedy CPO. In Roman I Trust.
caspar_blue
haha....so lets keep Lampard, Cole, Terry...and why cant we rename it to TLC FC???? Come on...people please move on....We had much better players and legends and we had moved on...
Blu_run
Plz dont compare Puyol to Terry and Xavi to Lampard anymore...Terry & Lampard are no match for them...Let us not fool ourselves....and people think chelsea lost its identity only after Roman taken over...oh wait, let me think, what was the identity for chelsea before that...what kind of football they used to play...how would they honour their legends???? People keep harping about LEGENDS when the legends itself are not interested in the club, keep talking to press directly undermining the club, manager at post, etc...
Blu_run
and barca gains about 2x revenue as ours so they can pay huge salaries but us Roman must write off losses yr in yr out. wise up friends its pay cut or no legends. You guys don't rem JT was flirting with city some yrs back and a 30 yr old lamps was holdn de club in ransome for triple figures. what goes round comes back round.
caspar_blue
well said Blu_RUN??
@Mq
The difference between Puyol, Xavi and Abidal are disciplined and never cause problems unlike like Terry, Lampard and Cole.
foreign_viewer
GabeU this is a brilliant piece...I wrote something pretty similar to this in the forums some weeks back 'What's the plan',but u were pretty detailed and well articulated on ur analysis. Some fans on here will never get it as most are pre- roman era and act like spoilt kids in the midst of toys so I have less to comment on them. Once again,great article GabeU.
nelyvanile
Typical GabeU article verbose and sanctimonious. We might as well bring back Zola, Desailly,& Le Saux and all will be well. You forgot to mention the unceremonious releasing of Eto and Ronaldinho at their legendary prime by the ethically superior Barcelona who are more than just a club.
traykidd
why many fans agree with these kind of articles when Lampard or cole performs well...why not when they fail to perform????
Blu_run
When did roman say he wants us to play like barca??..how often do we see/hear puyol or xavi cause barca problems/scandals??unlike terry and cole..how often do the barca legends go and mouth to the press when they dont start games or want contracts??unlike lampard...barca earn x2 our revenue so they can afford to pay puyol and xavi for as long as they play but we cant do same when ffp comes around...just as traykidd said u forgot to mention the unceremonious exits of eto and ronaldinho from barca...lets face the fact,we are creatin an identity for the future and if the legends wants to be a part of it then they should take a massive paycut and a 1yr rolling contract...in btw an interestin article though
Ken4CFC
Clearly some people here are not capable of understanding nuance or have preconceived ideas that they read into what is written. Traykidd for example decides that when he has little to contribute to the discussion he should just insult the author. I wont bother responding to that except to say lets see you put your own great thoughts down in articles for our fan community to read and critique. The issue of Eto and Ronaldinho was brought up and anyone who knows the history of these two would realize that it is exactly why Barca is more than a club as they claim. Eto was released because he refused to play second fiddle to Messi..he refused to be part of Peps vision and plan in this regard which was agreed upon by their entire football hierachy. He wanted to be paid commensurate with what he felt his value was. Despite that though go check his comments and views of Barca as an organization since he left..he still has the greatest affection and praise for the organisation, the club and its fans. Ronaldinhos release was because of the negative impact his personal lifestyle was having on the ethos that Pep wanted at Barca..it all goes back to having a clear identity, plan and style that Pep espoused and which Ronaldinho did not fit in with. The way Dinho declined the moment he left Barca shows they again made the right call here. Anyone who wants can read Ibrahimovic's biography that details his time at Barca...the place was described as being as sanitized by Pep as a Church vestry. This is the point of having a plan, a style, a mold and continuity into which the components fit and which ultimately breeds sustained success. Virtually every player who has left Barca recently still have that affinity for the place because of this foundation and set up...people can check up on the comments of players like Yaya Toure, Seydou Keita, Bojan kirstic as examples. Also i never said we should retain Lamps or JT on their terms...this issue is very different from what happened with Drogs who was offered a contract but declined, or with Ashley who has been offered a contract but has also declined..this is the minimum respect i feel these players deserve. Lamps and JT are not perfect but to suggest that they dont even deserve to be offered new contracts from us which they are then free to refuse is a bit rich. The same applies to the Danny situation..despite all the negative press on the young man he never put in a transfer request and still has nearly a year and half left on his present contract and this is why as we usher him out to Liverpool we have to pay him ~1.5m to do it. Everyone like i said in the article can have their views on how we evolve as a club and what our identity is..the pure business model of Roman and his three amigos has brought us trophies and success we never had before so it is fine if some feel that if it aint broke why fix it...for those of us who joined the fan base of this club prior to Roman and think about our future when he eventually leaves we are within our own rights to also wonder if this model is the best one for the clubs long term well being or not...as with many things time will tell.
GabeU
Wow GabeU, another great article possibly the best av read dis year. Our Chelsea is been run just as a club n nt more dan a club; A club/business where I don't give a ***** abt emotions, once I feel u ain't in upmost shape again, I jst discard u in a refuse bin. I only wish d Muamba issue would've thaught them that football is much much than a game/business.
Bunmiemich
Good articulation of thoughts, but I still do think that Roman has done more good in his decisions, besides as a owner, he has the right to demand the type of football that appeals to his senses. I do not necessarily think, he wants a Barca style football but more importantly for the team to play a more attractive style that appeals to its vast audience.
r.morais
Really plausible ideas in an excellent article. Gabeu,your writing skill and the progression with which you present your thoughts are worthy of encomium. Kudos mate!
Ohans
Really plausible ideas in an excellent article. Gabeu,your writing skill and the progression with which you present your thoughts are worthy of encomium. Kudos mate!
Ohans
Brilliant gabe u. You've hit the nail firmly on the head. I may not like barca in anyway shape or form, but they have a philosophy which has had work done to it over so many years until it becomes perfected for them. Now we want to replicate that instantly through a pipe dream. The board feel that hiring the man who perfected the tiki taka will instantly make us play like it. Philosophies in football are built on getting everyone playing and being in tune with that way, but that takes time which we don't have. Yes we should keep cole and lampard but it should be on our terms, not there's. how many times have we dictated to there terms with previous managers and players, now when it comes to contract renewals they still want the world. If they loved the club (which they say they do) then they would accept what's on offer and work to get a new one the following year. Lampard showed his importance in the Everton game but it doesn't warrant a 2 year contract.
Blue1989
Sentimentality should not get in the way of reality.
Blue1989
Sturridge was offered a contract sometime back last year, but he refused to sign as he wanted assurances of first team action. No club can give that assurances, if as per your coach & director dont trust you. I understand from various news that chelsea found that sturridge is not learning his trade fastly as a striker. he is supposed to be playing little selfish and he is not doing much to learn the team play...maybe that is the reason why chelsea wanted him to go out...personally i am sad that he left, given we trust torres to be striker, i would have given him chance (but he was injured for mosst of the season...bad luck)...
Blu_run
Chelsea are allowing Lampard, Cole to move on a free transfer rather than selling him...I will say that is a good gesture..they are forcing him out...If he dont want to move, then chelsea will definitely offer him a 1yr rolling contract on their own terms...but i am sure he will reject it given interest showed from MLS clubs, chinese league...
Blu_run
Lampard also have refused to play a reduced role...he wants to play every week, every game...you can see his interviews whenever he is not playing or when he played well...wont these interviews affect the morale of the dressing room??? then is the club or manager wrong to clean the house (like pep sanitizing barca church)...this was what AVB tried to do & we all know what happened.....when results go south, we blame coaches and not the players who are responsible for it...Roman has seen much of it and i am sure he wont make a mistake again....
Blu_run
Dude you right plentiful stuff about Pep/Barca like u know so much about their club, it's crazy really. Stick to Chelsea and Chelsea only, if you about criticizing the appointment of Pep then do so in the Chelsea context
@Mq
stop giving us Barca history lessons
@Mq
@MQ..it is a free world..no one is forcing you to read nor comment on what i write and clearly from the comments of others here you are the only one with those expressed views and frankly i really could care less what you think of what i write. I dont express my opinions to cater to you.
GabeU
One thing is certain, if chelsea doesn't renew the contract of JT,COLE and LAMPS, I am sure its part of what pep wants before he considers the managerial sit at stamford bridge
Desmondadonis
Roman actually wants good football and not for chelsea to play like Barca. chelsea will remain chelsea and barca remain barca. Let the media not confuse you.
Kendemsblue
Roman actually wants good football and not for chelsea to play like Barca. chelsea will remain chelsea and barca remain barca. Let the media not confuse you.
Kendemsblue
Roman actually wants good football and not for chelsea to play like Barca. chelsea will remain chelsea and barca remain barca. Let the media not confuse you.
Kendemsblue
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Chelsea Articles

Villa in for Moses! (Tuesday July 29 2014)

And Slowly They Arrive Back (Monday July 28 2014)

All is Forgiven... (Monday July 28 2014)

Walking on a tight rope... (Monday July 28 2014)

We`re Just Trying to Compete! (Monday July 28 2014)

NK Olimpija 1 Chelsea 2 (Monday July 28 2014)

Whatever you do; do quickly (Sunday July 27 2014)

Archived Chelsea Articles

List All Vital Chelsea Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. McQuinnChels 300
2. StamfordDLion 264
3. SameX 256
4. kolagold25 239
5. BOTUM 182
6. BlueABS 147
7. Blue_Mel 141
8. BlueMIA 120
9. foreign_viewer 119
10. syed230183_chelseafc 117

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. Burnley 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. Crystal Palace 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. Everton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. Hull City 0 0 0 0 0 0

Breaking League News

Walk Away or Stay?
West Ham : 29/07/2014 13:01:00
What Price a Goal or Two?
West Ham : 29/07/2014 13:00:00
A Broken Team!
Man Utd : 29/07/2014 12:57:00
Moyes in West Ham Job Link!
Man Utd : 29/07/2014 12:56:00
Arsenal Midfielder Considered Quitting
Arsenal : 29/07/2014 12:53:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Who should be our first choice keeper?
Suggested By:  oscarr
Petr Cech! 15%
Thibaut Courtois! 56%
Mark Schwarzer! 23%
Let Jose Mourinho Decide! 6%