UK time is: 04:49:17
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

The Mark of Controversy: Was Mikel right?

One season one controversy...

Well, this will no doubt be my shortest bit yet, as some can attest.

So, whilst it's no longer news that controversial referee Mark Clattenburg is engulfed in another player assault row having been accused by Southampton of allegedly "insulting" [verbally assaulting] their forward and England international Adam Lallana, does this perchance lend credence to the allegation that he "racially assaulted" Chelsea's Obi Mikel just a season ago?

Whereas The FA and the Professional Game Match Officials Limited(PGMOL) say the official "has no case to answer", I just thought I might ask to get your own opinion(s) on this latest dismal spat; especially as Southampton now say:

"Under the circumstances we do not feel it appropriate for Mr Clattenburg to officiate in any of our matches until this matter is properly resolved."

Do you think Southampton should do a Chelsea, forgive Clattenburg and let this row just ride for the sake of peace and honour for our prestigious league?

Or you reckon this episode, in this age of CCTV and when GCHQ routinely spies on us...and goal-line technology and so on, brings to the fore the need to record and publish what footballers say to referees, and vice versa?




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: HGH Magic Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday January 4 2014

Time: 11:40AM

Your Comments

Mark Clattenburg is arrogant and is different from other referess in the sense that he replies back when being badgered by players. He probably said something in the incident concerning Mikel, but I don't think it was racist. We went overboard with our case against Clattenburg. Lallana thing only reinforces the belief that Clattenburg isn't shy at lashing out verbally and arrogantly at players. He has been cleared of wrongdoing, but Saints want to pursue further. Not really sure how that's going to help. Last season we had the whole referee's union against us after the Mikel incident, plus our season fell off the rails soon after, thankfully we resolved it, club have to be given credit for it.
syed230183_chelseafc
No smoke without fire. Somehow these cases keep coming up when MC is the referee.
1970Blue
He was never proved to not have said those things. Conveniently, as no record of communication between the officials was kept, it was a case of insufficient evidence, and he got off. Did he use improper language with Mikel? From this latest incident with Lallana, and what he pulled with Bellamy before, it is almost certain that he did; whether racist or not, he called Mikel and in all likelihood Juan Mata too something that flies in the face of propriety. It's sad that officials are exempt from any sort of oversight whatsoever.
Carefree_1990
1970Blue.. I was going to make the self same comment .. No smoke without fire ...INDEED
Blue_Mel
why is he the only ref being accused? why isn't Howard Webb as shietty as he can be? not even Riley and mike dean have been accused, why is it clattenburg at all times? he is going to be accused of another stupid comment before the season ends and we'll see "mother hen FA" waive it away as a ploy against the man
Desmondadonis
At the height of the Mikel clattenburg gate i made comments along the lines of what Care states above. In Rubgy the voice mikes that the refs wear record everything. That changed the interactions between players and officials considerably and positively despite that sport being innately more physical and violent. The truth is the FA does not want the referees to be accountable and that is the only reason on the earth why the mic communications are not recorded for post match review if needed. As long as that is the case players will never be able to substantiate or win any he said, who said scenario. Sadly southhampton will pay a dear price for even making this public because the referees have this band of brothers mentality like cops..they generally close ranks even around "dirty" members so you can be sure South hampton will not be getting any favorable calls on any 50/50 situations this season. Mauricio Ponchettino has already started complaining about this but it wont change a thing. They should have learnt from our situation and just kept their collective mouths shut about this. I personally feel there is something about Clattenburg that causes him to be recurrently accused of this sort of thing. Carefree mentions three high profile cases we know of now that he has bee accused of in the last few years..for me that is no coincidence but till the FA decides to change its policy there is nothing clubs can do about this an complaining publicly will only get said club more punishment.
GabeU
My understanding is it was Ramires that heard what Clattenburg said and despite Clattenburg being cleared Ramires has not changed his mind about what he believes he heard. Ironically, the FA used Ashley Cole's evidence that he (Cole) had not heard Clattenburg say anything wrong to clear Clattenburg. This is ironic because in the John Terry case the FA chose not to believe Cole's evidence and as a result found Terry guilty. Seems like they believe Cole when it suits them.
CobhamBlue
A Referee who wants to act like a Celebrity and be one is what I see when I see this guy. I bet he signs autographs too lol
StamfordDLion
Lmao StamforD - dude even had a hair transplant, and now drives a Porsche ... bet he thinks he looks cooler than a certain Howard Webbosky ;)
HGH Magic
Everyday is for the thief but one day is for the owner of the house
OBEX
lmao can't stop laughing at Stamford Ds comment and hgh's additions, Cobham's comments t oozes of sweet sarcasm, lol
Desmondadonis
IMO Clattenburg and Chris Foy should not be PL officials....
The Persian
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Chelsea Articles

Chelsea At Derby (Thursday October 30 2014)

This Beautiful Thing Of Ours (Thursday October 30 2014)

Fantastic Team, Fantastic Opponent (Wednesday October 29 2014)

January Pique Bid? (Wednesday October 29 2014)

Cole's Return With Rivals? (Wednesday October 29 2014)

The Shrewsbury Chronicles; Post script (Wednesday October 29 2014)

Stats: Shrewsbury v Chelsea (Tuesday October 28 2014)

Chelsea Trio (And Mourinho) Nominated (Tuesday October 28 2014)

Purslow's Chelsea Role (Tuesday October 28 2014)

Match Day Moments - Shrewsbury Town (a) (Tuesday October 28 2014)

Archived Chelsea Articles

List All Vital Chelsea Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Bharath Narayanan 161
2. BOTUM 142
3. BlueMIA 105
4. Ikdaniels 103
5. The Persian 103
6. kolagold25 53
7. CobhamBlue 42
8. Chelsea Anorak 42
9. merlin 40
10. nelyvanile 36

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Man Utd 1 - 1 Chelsea
Crystal Palace 1 - 2 Chelsea
Chelsea 2 - 0 Arsenal
Chelsea 3 - 0 Aston Villa
Man City 1 - 1 Chelsea
Chelsea 4 - 2 Swansea

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 9 7 2 0 +15 23
2. Southampton 9 6 1 2 +15 19
3. Man City 9 5 2 2 +9 17
4. West Ham 9 5 1 3 +5 16
5. Arsenal 9 3 5 1 +4 14
6. Swansea 9 4 2 3 +3 14
7. Liverpool 9 4 2 3 +1 14

Breaking League News

Swansea Hopeful Sigurdsson & Ki Will Return
Swansea : 30/10/2014 20:52:00
Swansea City Have Fernandez Red Card Rescinded
Swansea : 30/10/2014 20:44:00
Irvine Expecting Tough Leicester Encounter
WBA : 30/10/2014 17:12:00
Varela Resumes Full Training
WBA : 30/10/2014 17:07:00
Koeman Delighted With Second Stoke Win
Southampton : 30/10/2014 16:55:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury (a)
Suggested By:  Josh_Mou
Oscar 18%
Salah 34%
Drogba 9%
Ake 20%
Christensen 19%