Vital Football

Latest Chelsea FC News

Marriner Gets Off Scot-Free!

Marriner Gets Off Scot-Free!

And so it came to pass that after a refereeing display that produced one of the most comical moments of the season so far, the culprit Andre Marriner, is set to escape scot-free.

Marriner who, laughably, sent off Kieran Gibbs instead of Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, will not be censored and will be taking charge of a Premier League match this weekend.

Furthermore, probably quite rightly, the red card given to Gibbs has been rescinded and due to the fact Eden Hazard`s shot was drifting wide when Oxlade-Chamberlain handled it, he real offender will also not be subjected to a red card.

Which, courtesy of an e-mail from Vital Chelsea member daygreenich, got me thinking.

Trawling through my fading memory banks I can recall Jimmy Floyd-Hasselbaink being shown a red card at White Hart Lane, by Mark Halsey when, in fact it should have been shown to Mario Melchiott, but have there been any other cases of red-cards being rescinded, involving Chelsea players, you can recall in recent times?



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Merlin
Date:Tuesday March 25 2014
Time: 7:39AM

Comments

0
Oxlade Chemberlain (not sure about the spelling, probably that is why Marriner preferred to write Gibbs instead) should be serving the 3 match ban. Ok the ball was going out but what about the spirit of the game. He dived like a GK to save it. He obviously thought it is going in. Any player who does this should be serving ban.
Keyser Soze
25/03/2014 08:27:00
0
Surprised the RED on Ox did not stick ... i agree that his intention was to (unfairly) stop a goal .... whether it was going slightly wide is besides the point.
ZeeNut
25/03/2014 08:32:00
0
What i don't understand is football authorities making what has been done on the pitch as final and hardly be changed. Replays has clearly shown it was Oxlade who was guilty so why on earh isn't the red card wrongly given to gibbs not been recinded and handed to the appropriate person?? If gibbs happens to miss the next BPL game as a result of the red card wrongly apportioned him then that will be a real shame to football and justice.
kolagold25
25/03/2014 09:13:00
0
Totally ridiculous the the Ox isn't banned. Once the cards was swapped from Gibbs to Ox how he can escape a ban is beyond comprehension. To overturn a red card it is supposed to be a clear and obvious refereeing error. There isn't a referee in the country wouldn't have sent the Ox off for that acrobatic save. Only tv replays showed the ball was probably going wide, but that is not how football is supposed to be refereed. That's Spurs & Arsenal both had, what I reckon, were perfectly legitimate red cards rescinded, Yaya Toure got away with kicking a Norwich player, and yet Willian's red card stood. We may yet lose the title because of that farcical refereeing at Villa Park. No wonder Jose thinks Chelsea are treated differently.
CobhamBlue
25/03/2014 10:19:00
0
Not to bothered about Marriner and Gibbs but the get off that Alex has received shows the inconsistency of the Refs and the idiots that make these behind the scenes decisions. While the game was going on, i said to myself "ok, Gibbs is gone, atleast Ox will get the ban after the match". How wrong i was!!
SmokezDoT
25/03/2014 11:35:00
0
This is sickening..not because i have any axe to grind with the gunners..i dont but rather because it shows just how much of a joke the FA is. Clearly the red against Gibbs should have been rescinded and applied to the ox..everyone at stamford bridge that day and everyone watching on tv could see that..the only clueless person was the central referee and this was just a comical display of why i am one of the most vociferous advocates that the time for video replay refs to be introduced into pro foottie is long overdue. what is absolutely farcial however is the cheap attempt of the FA to deflect the attention from the refs obvious blunder by making an obviously even more egragrious call. Ox dove like a keeper and handled a ball and deflected it right in the 6 yard box. How anyone can presume to be certain where that ball was heading prior to his contact with it is laughable but it was clear as day what his intent was..it was to prevent a goal. The rules are as clear as daylight on this situation..the penalty is a penalty awarded, a red to the player and a three game suspension. Luiz Suarez did this sort of thing in the 2010 world cup against Ghana and the punishment was fully administered. There are so many other examples and yet here the FA in their infinite idiocy decide to change the rules when they feel it suits them. Meanwhile they also conviniently decide to not as much as make any mention regarding the horror show of referring imbecility that Chris Foy had on display in our game against Villa. With an FA like this run by clowns like this it is no surprise why the English national teams at all age levels in England will continue to flatter to deceive and it will be the same script at Rio this summer. What a bunch of jokers these guys are!!!
GabeU
25/03/2014 11:46:00
0
I think the FA has been unfair to Chelsea in this particular decision. We see red cards shown to players who did not hurt fellow players in a tackle, but are punished because of their intents. Oxlade would have been retrospectively punished for his intent. But come to think of it, the FA hardly knew they indirectly did Chelsea a favour by letting Oxlade off the hook, meaning he will be eligible to play against City (our greatest rival to the title) this weekend
KLblue
25/03/2014 18:28:00
0
Thank you GabeU. Bunch of hypocrites!
elemzy
26/03/2014 12:15:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Chelsea Articles

Chelsea Linked with young Italian Striker

The arrival of Antonio Conte at Chelsea Football Club has given the club the shake-up it needed.

Fabregas in Arsenal Link

Yesterday, up at the Etihad Stadium, Antonio Conte was forced into making a change to his starting eleven.

A victory for Conte's values over Guardiola's

8 wins a row! Now that's an emphatic title statement if ever there was one!

City (a) - Post-Match Fascinating Facts

Eight Premier League wins on the bounce has put Chelsea firmly at the summit of the Premier League.

Archived Vital Chelsea Articles

Vital Chelsea articles from

Site Journalists

Merlin
Editor email
Profile
Stan Wenners
no email
Profile
GabeU
no email
Profile
Tom
no email
Profile
Dylan M
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

MOTM v Manchester City (a)?
Suggested By: merlin
Courtois7%
Moses9%
Azpilicueta9%
David Luiz18%
Cahill1%
Alonso0%
Kante0%
Fabregas1%
Pedro1%
Diego Costa45%
Hazard7%
Willian1%
Chalobah1%
Batshuayi0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Chelsea 14 11 1 2 34 21
2 Arsenal 14 9 4 1 31 19
3 Liverpool 14 9 3 2 30 17
4 Man City 14 9 3 2 30 15
5 Spurs 14 7 6 1 27 14
6 Man Utd 14 5 6 3 21 3
7 WBA 14 5 5 4 20 3
8 Everton 14 5 5 4 20 1
9 Stoke 14 5 4 5 19 -3
10 AFC Bournemouth 14 5 3 6 18 -3
11 Watford 14 5 3 6 18 -6
12 Southampton 14 4 5 5 17 -2
13 Crystal Palace 14 4 2 8 14 -2
14 Burnley 14 4 2 8 14 -11
15 Leicester City 14 3 4 7 13 -7
16 Middlesbrough 13 2 6 5 12 -3
17 West Ham 14 3 3 8 12 -14
18 Sunderland 14 3 2 9 11 -10
19 Hull City 13 3 2 8 11 -17
20 Swansea 14 2 3 9 9 -15
The Vital Football Members League
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Vital Football Comment

Recent Chelsea Results (view all)

Chelsea Fixtures (view all)

Dec 11 2016 12:00PM : West Bromwich Albion (H)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 14 2016 7:45PM : Sunderland (a)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 17 2016 12:30PM : Crystal Palace (a)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 26 2016 3:00PM : AFC Bournemouth (H)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 31 2016 3:00PM : Stoke City (H)
Barclays Premier League
Jan 4 2017 8:00PM : Tottenham Hotspur (a)
Barclays Premier League

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.unclezillion16
2.Solid715
3.StamfordDLion13
4.Latunvic13
5.herefordchelsea9
6.Pantera989
7.ZeeNut9
8.analooish8
9.Sdblues7
10.Michael Reid7
Write for Vital Football